- DTN Headline News
EPA Cellulosic Proposal Gets Pushback
By Todd Neeley
Wednesday, January 22, 2025 9:47AM CST

LINCOLN, Neb. (DTN) -- Although a new proposal from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to reduce cellulosic biofuels levels in the Renewable Fuel Standard is on hold pending review by the new administration, biofuels groups spoke in opposition to the proposal in comments submitted this past week.

The EPA, under the Biden administration, proposed allowing a partial waiver of 2024 cellulosic requirements and the extension of a deadline to comply on the volumes finalized in June 2023.

That final rule set cellulosic ethanol volumes at 840 million gallons for 2023, 1.09 billion in 2024 and 1.38 billion in 2025.

On Dec. 12, 2024, the EPA published a proposed rule to partially wave the 2024 cellulosic volumes because of what is reportedly a shortfall in production.

In comments to the EPA, several national biofuels groups spoke out against the proposal.

Geoff Cooper, CEO and president of the Renewable Fuels Association (RFA), said in a letter to EPA that partially waiving the cellulosic volumes would harm the market for biofuels credits in the RFS.

"RFA believes that retrospectively lowering RVOs destabilizes the RIN market, discourages investment and is contrary to the market-forcing purpose of the RFS program," Cooper said in comments.

"Reopening RVOs long after they have been finalized chills investment and growth in cellulosic-biofuel production and causes a loss of confidence in EPA's standards. However, we understand the challenge EPA is facing with regard to setting cellulosic biofuel standards in a manner that is simultaneously consistent with the agency's statutory authorities, court decisions and the Congressional intent of the RFS program."

Cooper said if the EPA grants the waiver, the agency should ensure that it "clearly meets" the statutory requirements for such waivers.

"Unfortunately, we do not believe that EPA's proposal to use its general waiver authority has fully satisfied these requirements," Cooper said.

The EPA previously rejected requests for retroactive waivers to 2023 cellulosic volumes.

Chris Bliley, senior vice president of regulatory affairs for Growth Energy, said a waiver on 2024 volumes would harm the purpose of the RFS.

"Any waiver of 2024 cellulosic volume requirements should not provide precedent for the future of the RFS program or suppress RFS program goals, which are to drive production and innovation of biofuels, including cellulosic biofuels and not to passively track a biofuels marketplace without them," he said in comments.

"Furthermore, delaying the compliance deadline injects unnecessary uncertainty into the process for bioethanol producers and the entire fuel supply chain."

Clean Fuels Alliance America asked the agency to pause the rulemaking process until the agency can provide a full accounting of available cellulosic renewable identification numbers, or RINs, for 2024 and to evaluate whether pending small-refinery exemptions provide relief to refiners. In addition, Clean Fuels asked the EPA to address the underestimation of biomass-based diesel and advanced biofuel volumes for 2024 and 2025.

"We cannot accurately evaluate EPA's calculation of an inadequate supply of cellulosic RINs for 2024 without first knowing the number of RINs that might be returned to the market through small-refinery exemptions," Clean Fuels said in its comments.

"We ask that EPA finalize a step-change in 2024 advanced RVOs to EPA's own projected advanced RIN generation, which is currently expected to exceed the required volumes by at least 2.6 billion RINs. Clean Fuels appreciates EPA's acknowledging a more-than-adequate supply of advanced and renewable RINs but this alone is not enough. EPA should take this opportunity instead to address Clean Fuels' petition and reconsider the 2024 and 2025 BBD and advanced biofuel RVOs."

Read more on DTN:

"EPA Finalizes Multi-Year RFS Volumes," https://www.dtnpf.com/…

Todd Neeley can be reached at todd.neeley@dtn.com

Follow him on social platform X @DTNeeley


blog iconDTN Blogs & Forums
Technically Speaking
Editorial Staff
Tuesday, January 7, 2025 9:41AM CST
Monday, December 2, 2024 10:28AM CST
Monday, August 19, 2024 11:24AM CST
DTN Ag Policy Blog
Chris Clayton
DTN Ag Policy Editor
Tuesday, January 21, 2025 3:01PM CST
Tuesday, January 21, 2025 7:32AM CST
Friday, January 17, 2025 6:30AM CST
Minding Ag's Business
Katie Behlinger
Farm Business Editor
Wednesday, December 4, 2024 8:01AM CST
Thursday, November 14, 2024 12:31PM CST
Thursday, November 14, 2024 12:31PM CST
DTN Ag Weather Forum
Bryce Anderson
DTN Ag Meteorologist and DTN Analyst
Wednesday, January 22, 2025 3:39PM CST
Wednesday, January 22, 2025 3:39PM CST
Wednesday, January 22, 2025 3:39PM CST
DTN Production Blog
Pam Smith
Crops Technology Editor
Monday, January 13, 2025 12:37PM CST
Monday, December 23, 2024 1:48PM CST
Thursday, December 19, 2024 12:17PM CST
An Urban’s Rural View
Urban Lehner
Editor Emeritus
Sunday, January 12, 2025 7:42PM CST
Tuesday, January 7, 2025 2:37PM CST
Thursday, January 2, 2025 9:23AM CST
Canadian Markets
Cliff Jamieson
Canadian Grains Analyst
Monday, January 20, 2025 12:48PM CST
Thursday, January 16, 2025 12:10PM CST
Monday, January 13, 2025 1:35PM CST
Editor’s Notebook
Greg D. Horstmeier
DTN Editor-in-Chief
Tuesday, December 31, 2024 8:27AM CST
Monday, December 16, 2024 11:42AM CST
Wednesday, October 23, 2024 12:11PM CST
Copyright DTN. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.
Powered By DTN